Bespoke is the TACCOC club magazine for its members. It is
printed roughly four times a year, and John Holmes has been
the Editor since the club began in 1976. From time to time,
various extracts of interest will appear on this site.
The seemingly illogical and ill-conceived imposition of a blanket $25 plus GST additional fee on every competitor at Hampton Downs, has not been followed by any of the other circuits. It was said to cover ‘Health and Safety’, and has been received very badly by the competitors. The unpopularity of this random and draconian extra fee was confirmed at the September ‘Icebreaker’ meeting, which was notable for the fact that the compulsory “Health and Safety” Inspector supposedly paid for by this arbitrarily imposed additional cost was nowhere to be seen. Various competitors were muttering darkly about this.
When it came time for our October Classic Race meeting at Hampton Downs, we included this extra levy in the entry fee, and competitors paid this when they completed their entries online. Quite close to the event itself, we were informed by the circuit management that they were not going to be charging this extra fee after all, as they hadn’t yet put all the systems in place to handle it. We immediately announced that we would refund the $28.75 to every competitor that had paid, which was greatly appreciated by all. It involved a considerable amount of extra work, and a lot of extra cash handling on the day, but TACCOC isn’t in the business to make money – we enjoy our status of providing the best value race meetings around. At the moment the only additional extra cost that the entry fee has to cover is the $53 per competitor that Motorsport New Zealand now takes as their cut. Which is over and above all of MNZ’s normal fees for race permits and Steward’s costs, etc…
Now this extra fee has re-appeared, and all track hirers have been compelled to reinstate it for all future meetings at Hampton Downs. The $28.75 “Health and Safety” charge will be imposed on every competitor, including those using the Skid Pan and the Go Kart circuit. This is a vastly more all-encompassing imposition than was originally proposed, and will have a much greater impact on a much larger number of EDITORIAL track users. No longer limited to just MNZ-permitted events, this will now be applied to all users of all sections of the circuit at any given time.
It is still only the Hampton Downs circuit that has imposed this additional charge. The Hampton Downs management may feel that they have read the new Health and Safety regulations more thoroughly and interpreted the changes more accurately than the other circuit owners. The other circuit owners probably believe that the reverse is true…
This has interesting parallels with the other circuit in this network. When we first visited the then-new Highlands Park circuit at Cromwell a couple of years ago, we talked to a lot of the competitors. They were mostly making their first visit, and were all generally enthusiastic about this new circuit. But their comments all followed a similar trail – “We’ve had a great time; it’s a fantastic track, great facilities, great atmosphere, spectacular scenery, but we’re never coming here again…” Highlands is a hard place to get to from the North Island, and the time it takes to get down there and get home again means too much time off work for amateurs to constantly shoulder the costs involved.
And in the end, that’s what we all are: a bunch of amateurs providing amateur motor sport for another bunch of amateur competitors. This does not mean that our events are not well run – they are very professionally run meetings which have been acclaimed by competitors from around the world. But you alienate the large support base of volunteers, both competitors and helpers, at your peril. If they decide to vote with their feet and not come to the events, the sport dies. Motorsport in New Zealand draws its entire army of personnel; its officials, its workers, its helpers and all of its competitors from a very small pond…
From this year’s Goodwood Revival meeting, the 1964 version of the Ferrari GTO.
A Fighter Pilot’s Guide to Surviving on the Roads...
What’s wrong with you - are you blind?!!
The following piece was sent in by Peter Hill. It first appeared in 2012, but is entirely relevant today. You may consider yourself an above average driver, but this piece clarifies why that is not the case, and has the science behind it as to why. Best of all, it’s mostly not your fault, but there are things you can do to improve yourself. The auther, John Sullivan, is a Royal Air Force pilot with over 4000 flight hours, and a keen cyclist. He regards himself as ‘a simple fighter-pilot’ and in this article he describes why collisions can occur and, in layman’s terms, how some of the techniques of flying fighters can be used to increase your chances of survival on the roads. All proceeds
from this article are going to charity. Read on…
Who hasn’t formed these thoughts, or similar, at some point while cycling or driving? Probably in response to a vehicle that had just moved directly into your path - and you might congratulate yourself that only your alertness and superior reactions saved the day. If you were cycling then I expect that you may have even shared your thoughts, loudly, with the offending driver, and if you were driving then I imagine that there would have been some accompaniment from the horn section. Hopefully you were able to
prevent the collision.
Fighter pilots have to cope
with closing speeds of over
1000 mph, and they don’t
always get it right! But
crashes are always analysed
carefully to learn the
lessons that might prevent
future accidents. This
article reveals the hard-won
techniques that fighter
pilots are trained to use.
Now, before we go on, who can say that, at some point in their own driving history, they have not been about to manoeuvre, pull out from a T-junction, etc, when a car or bike seemed to come out of nowhere? Hopefully, it was just a close shave, and no doubt quite frightening. You may have wondered how you failed to see it, and probably concluded that they must have been driving ‘far too fast’ or you would have seen them. Perhaps, on such an occasion, you were the recipient of that loud and
urgent query, ‘Are you blind?!!’
Well, here’s the bad news; yes, you are. For small but significant periods of time you are completely incapable of seeing anything at all. Most of the time, as I shall explain, this is not a problem. But if it means that you fail to see a vehicle that is just about to occupy the same point in space and time as you are, then this is a big problem! The good news is that understanding why we sometimes do not see things allows us to adopt some defensive strategies that tip the odds back in our favour. This article
then, is a fighter pilot’s survival guide to avoiding collisions...
First some background. We all inhabit bodies that have evolved over hundreds of thousands of years to our environment. We are highly adaptable, omnivorous creatures, which is why we have prevailed when other species, those suited to specific environments, habitats or diets, have not. We learned how to grow crops but we started off as hunter/gatherers. We have eyes in the front of our heads which gives us
binocular vision for judging distance to prey, or threats.
Our eyes, and the way that our brain processes the images that they receive, are very well suited to creeping up on unsuspecting antelopes. We are even pretty good at spotting sabre-toothed tigers creeping up on us! We are, however, rubbish at spotting
vehicles that hurtle towards us at high speed. Let me explain why...
Light enters our eyes and falls upon the retina, whereupon it is converted into electrical impulses that the brain perceives as images. Clever stuff. Only a small part of the retina, in the centre and called the fovea, can generate a high-resolution image. This is why we need to look directly at something, by moving our eyes, to see detail. The rest of the retina contributes to our visual experience by adding the peripheral detail; hence peripheral vision. Peripheral vision cannot resolve detail, which prevents the brain from being overloaded with too much information, but it is very good at detecting movement. Any movement, such as the twitch of an antelope’s ears or the swish of a tiger’s tail, immediately alerts us to something of interest which we can then bring our high-resolution fovea to bear upon. And our eyes move fast, really fast, no doubt spurred on by the motivation to see the slavering chops of our sabre-toothed friend in
glorious technicolour detail with enough time to do something about it.
Well, first, it is an unfortunate fact that if you are going to collide with another moving object, and assuming that you are both travelling in a straight line, then there is no apparent movement between the occupant of either vehicle. That is, to the driver of
each vehicle, the other will remain in exactly the same position in the windscreen up to the point of impact. There is no relative movement, so our peripheral vision is not
suited to detecting it. For completeness, this does not mean that you cannot hit a
vehicle that is turning, but as the other vehicle adopts a path that will lead to collision
then it will cease to move relative to you; it will become stationary in your windscreen.
Whether they are on the road or in the air, vehicles traveling
at a constant speed will stay in
the same position relative to
each other as they approach a
point of collision. In the
illustration, a car is approaching
a cross-roads but it is on a
collision course with a
motorcycle approaching from
the right. The car is going
faster, and so at any one point
in time it is further from the
collision point, but they will get
there at the same time! To the
driver of the car, the
motorcycle is about 30º right,
or in his 1 o’clock, and the
motorbike will stay in exactly
that same relative position in
the windscreen until impact. To
the motorcyclist, the car is 90º
left, or in her 9 o’clock, and it
will also remain in exactly that
relative position until impact.
Remember, our peripheral vision is not good with detail - in fact, just 20º away from your sightline your visual acuity is about one tenth of what it is at the centre. Not convinced? Well, the standard eyesight requirement for driving in the UK is to read a car number plate at 20m. Go outside, now, and stand just 10m from a car, look just one car’s width to one side, and try and read the number plate without moving where your eyes are looking! Try again from 5m. Clinically, you are blind in your peripheral vision.
That’s not to say that we cannot see something in our peripheral vision; of course we can. As you approach a roundabout you would be hard pressed not to see a dirty great articulated lorry bearing down upon you, even out of the corner of your eye. Obviously, the bigger the object, the more likely we are to see it. But would you see a motorbike, or a cyclist?
To have a good chance of seeing an object on a collision course, we need to move our eyes, and probably our head, to bring the object into the centre of our vision, so that we can use our high-resolution foveal vision to resolve the detail.
Now for the really interesting part. When we move our head and eyes to scan a scene, our eyes are incapable of moving smoothly across that scene and seeing everything. This makes perfect sense, just like trying to take a picture without holding the camera still, the image would be blurred. So, our clever brain overcomes this by moving our eyes (really fast, remember) in a series of jumps (called saccades) with very short pauses (called fixations), and it is only during the pauses that an image is processed. Our brains fill in the gaps with a combination of peripheral vision and an assumption that what is in the gaps must be the same as what you see during the pauses. This might sound crazy, but your brain actually blocks the image that is being received while your eyes are moving, which is why you do not see the sort of blurred image that you see when you look sideways out of a train window.
Unless you are tracking a moving object, such as an antelope, then the human eyes are
incapable of moving smoothly across a scene; they jump and pause occasionally to take a ‘snapshot’ of the scene.
Definitely not convinced? Okay, go to a mirror, now, and look repeatedly from your right eye to your left eye. Can you see your eyes moving? You cannot. Now have a friend or partner do the same thing while you watch them. You will see their eyes moving quite markedly. You couldn’t see your own eyes move because your brain shuts down the image for the instant that your eyes are moving. Experiments have shown that it is impossible to see even a flash of light if it occurs within a saccade. The saccade/fixation mechanism has always served us rather well, and means that we can creep up on antelopes without being overloaded by unnecessary detail and a lot of useless, blurred images. But it does present us with some shortcomings now that we routinely climb into metal boxes and hurtle towards each other. Our eyes and brains are just not designed for this. Our world has changed far faster than our bodies can adapt.
If you get to a junction and move your head right and left to look for oncoming traffic, you need to understand that you cannot guarantee that you have seen approaching traffic. It is entirely possible for our eyes to ‘jump over’ an oncoming vehicle during one of the saccades. The smaller (and specifically, the narrower) the vehicle, the greater the chance that it could fall within a saccade. You are not being inattentive, you are physically incapable of seeing anything during a saccade. Remember the ‘Think Bike!’ adverts, where a driver pulls out into the path of a motorcycle? I am convinced that it is the phenomena of saccades and fixations that is most likely to lead to this sort of accident.
It gets worse. The faster you move your head, the larger the jumps, or saccades, and the shorter the pauses, or fixations. So you are more likely to jump over an oncoming vehicle and less likely to detect any movement in your peripheral vision, because there
is even less time available for slight, relative movement to become apparent.
narrow, are more
likely to fall within a
saccade. This image
represents a driver
looking quickly left,
and the approaching
within a saccade and
is never seen in high
simulated by the
toning down in this
It gets even worse. Not only can we not see though solid objects (well, opaque objects, to be more accurate) but research has shown that we tend not to look near to the edges of a framed scene. In plain language, we tend not to look at the edges of a windscreen. So not only do the door pillars of a car represent a physical blindspot, but our eyes tend not to fixate near to it, leading to an even bigger jump, or saccade, past
a door pillar. This is called windscreen zoning.
One further point of interest. Our ears usually contribute to the process of building up a picture of our surroundings too. The snap of a twig from an unwary paw is another prompt for us to direct our vision towards something of interest. But in our metal cocoons, with the radio or mp3 playing, this is yet another cue that we are denied. So, consider this scenario - you approach a big roundabout or junction, looking ahead at the junction of course, and the road seems to be empty. As you get closer, you look right and left as a prudent, final check. You see no other vehicles and proceed through the junction. Suddenly, and it’s your lucky day, there is an indignant blast of horn and a car flashes across in front of you, missing you by inches and leaving you
thoroughly shocked, and confused. Sound familiar?
So what happened? On the approach you did not see that another car was on a perfect collision course, with no relative movement for your peripheral vision to detect - possibly compounded by being behind the door pillar. Lulled into a false sense of security you looked quickly right and left, to avoid holding up the traffic behind you, and your eyes jumped cleanly over the approaching vehicle, especially as it was still close to the door pillar in the windscreen. The rest of the road was empty, and this
was the scene that your brain used to fill in the gaps! Scary, huh?
You were not being inattentive, but you were being ineffective.
Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse, there is also the phenomenon of ‘expectation’ and your brain is less likely to recognise something that you are not expecting to see. This now enters territory that pilots prefer to leave to a scary breed of creature called the aviation psychologist but suffice it to say that if you think the
road is empty, you are less likely to register that a vehicle is actually present.
So what can we do about it? Well, quite a lot actually, as forewarned is forearmed.
Give yourself a chance! Compare the visibility of the cyclists wearing bright coloured
tops, as compared to the cyclist in the centre.
Always slow down as you approach a roundabout or junction, even if only by 20 mph or so, and even if the road seems empty. Changing your speed will immediately generate relative movement against a vehicle that was otherwise on a collision course - not only are you then more likely to see it, but you are no longer on a collision course!
Never just glance right and left - this leaves it entirely to chance whether you see an approaching vehicle or not - and if you glance quickly, the odds decrease markedly.
Always look right and left methodically, deliberately focusing on at least 3 different spots along the road to the right and 3 to the left - search close, middle-distance and far. With practice, this can still be accomplished quickly, and each pause is only for a fraction of a second, but this means that you are now overriding the natural limitations of the eye and brain. Fighter pilots call this a ‘lookout scan’ and it is vital to their
This image is taken on an
overcast day – what
photographers might call a
However, the vehicles in
this scene can all be seen
easily, and the light
coloured top of the scooter
rider provides reasonable
contrast against the
background. Note that the
headlight is especially
Always look right and left at least twice. Not only does this immediately double your chance of seeing a vehicle, but if you repeat the same scan as you did the first time (which, when it becomes a well-practiced habit, you almost certainly will) then an approaching vehicle will have moved to a different part of the windscreen by the time you look the second time and is less likely to be masked by a saccade. Just note that this will not work if you charge into a junction at a constant speed because any vehicle on a collision course will stay in the same position in the windscreen. If you miss it the
first time, you will probably miss it the second time too!
Make a point of looking next to the windscreen pillars. Better still, lean forward slightly as you look right and left so that you are looking around the door pillars. Be aware that the pillar nearest to you blocks more of your vision. Fighter pilots say ‘Move your
head - or you’re dead’.
Clear your flight path! When you change lanes, especially into a slower lane, you should, of course, check your mirrors, and will have undoubtedly been watching the road ahead of you, naturally. Your last check must be to look directly at the spot into which you are going to manoeuvre, otherwise you could easily have missed a slower motorbike or cyclist in that lane, one that was only in your peripheral vision as you looked ahead, and over which you ‘jumped’ as you looked over your shoulder or
checked your wing mirror.
Drive with your lights on. Aviation research shows that contrast is the single most important factor in determining the likelihood of acquiring an object visually - this is why military aircraft camouflage is designed to tone down their contrast. On the ground, dark coloured vehicles or clothing will result in reduced contrast against most usual backgrounds, and this is why high-visibility clothing (for pedestrians, cyclists and
motorcyclists) and/or bright lights are so important, in the daytime as well as at night.
This image captures almost
the exact same scene, but on a
clear day with a low sun. Note
how the contrast is much
poorer, making it difficult to
see the details of anything
into sun. Vehicle lights
provide the best defence, so
turn them on - remember that
the additional load on the
engine, in running the
alternator as it powers the
headlamps, is completely
insignificant as compared to
the cost of an accident repair!
While it is generally understood that a low sun can make it difficult to see, it is probably not generally understood why: driving into sun reduces contrast, especially when vehicles and pedestrians fall into the shadow of larger, up-sun objects. You must beware that even large vehicles, and especially motorbikes, cyclists and pedestrians, can become completely impossible to see under these circumstances, and you must
moderate your driving accordingly. This is why fighter pilots attack from out of the sun!
Keep your windscreen clean! Seeing other vehicles can be difficult enough, without tipping the odds against you by having to look through a dirty windscreen. You never
see a fighter jet with a dirty canopy.
And finally, don’t be a clown - if you are looking at your mobile telephone then you are incapable of seeing much else. Not only are you probably looking down into your lap, but your eyes are focused at less then one metre and every object at distance will be out of focus. Even when you look up and out, it takes a fraction of a second for your
eyes to adjust - this is time you may not have.
Motorcyclists and cyclists:
Recognise that you are especially at risk - not only are you more vulnerable but the narrow profile of a motorbike or cycle makes it far more likely that you can fall into a saccade. So tip the odds in your favour - always wear high-contrast clothing and use
lights. Flashing LEDs (front and rear) are especially effective for cyclists as they create contrast and the on-off flashing attracts the peripheral vision in the same
manner that movement does.
The relatively slower speed of bicycles means that they will be closer to a point of collision if a vehicle begins to pull into their path. Turn this to advantage - when passing junctions, look at the head of the driver that is approaching or has stopped. The head of the driver will naturally stop and centre upon you if you have been seen. If the driver’s head sweeps through you without pausing, then the chances are that you are in a saccade - you must assume that you have not been seen and expect the driver to pull out!
In this scene the sun is partly covered by cloud but contrast is still poor and high
visibility clothing, in bright colours that are not generally encountered in the
background scene, will increase contrast and be detected more easily. Can you see
the moped rider behind the truck in the picture?
Die-hard cyclists are unwilling to compromise their training for such inconveniences as poor weather - I know. But be aware of when the odds are really stacking up against you. If you are cycling into a low sun, have a think about how difficult it is to see the vehicles in front of you. Now imagine that you are also looking through a dirty windscreen, or one with rain beating against it! Are you content that drivers approaching from behind have a realistic chance of seeing you? Maybe today is the day to take a different route - or time your journey to avoid the sun being straight into the eyes of drivers on that particularly busy stretch of road. Or take the bus. Having a really low heart rate at the point at which you go under the wheels of a truck is rather pointless. This is risk management.
So is wearing a helmet - every fighter pilot wears a helmet, even though it won’t make much difference if they hit the ground at 700 miles an hour! It’s about reducing the chances of less dramatic incidents causing fatal cranial injuries, unnecessarily. Go figure.
This is an enlargement of the moped with its lights on, sitting behind the truck in the
photo on the left. Not that easy to see even here.